|
March 8, 2013 02:03:19
Posted By The Stash
|
|
Our tradition suggests that we can learn important spiritual lessons from the confluence of holy days and parashiyot ha’shavua—the weekly Torah portions. For example, Parashat Miketz almost always coincides with Chanukah, and Parashat Bamidbar almost always occurs just before Shavuot. There are many explanations that attempt to explain why these are not coincidences. By extension, it is not too random to observe that we are always well into the Book of Vayikra, somewhere between parashiot Tzav and Acharei Mot/Kedoshim when Pesach arrives. All of these parashiot provide detailed delineations of the various offerings presented in the Tabernacle and the precise methods of preparing and offering them. Traditional commentaries reveled in these myriad details, seeing in them a deep desire to reach the Divine through careful preparation and meticulous adherence to a sacred ritual while garbed in clothing designed to reflect solemnity and holiness. But if the detail was divine for traditionalists, it is devilish for moderns. Most readers see Sefer Vayikra as some sort of cultic ritual jarring to the sensibilities: blood spills on the altar, is sprinkled here and there, tossed upon the people, and dashed off walls. Gruesome, gory material—pity the poor b’nai and b’not mitzvah struggling to write divrei Torah about these parashiyot! What is the point of reading about these rituals? The Conservative movement was so conflicted by all this that in 1946 its Siddur made a significant liturgical shift. It changed the Hebrew and the English in a key part of the Shabbat Musaf prayer that commemorates these offerings from a request in future tense that “may we offer these offering again in the future” to “these offerings were offered” in the past tense. The intention was to acknowledge the past without hoping for its future restoration, which was the key part of the Musaf prayer. Even more telling was the Meditation added : “We remember the devotion of our ancestors as they worshipped in Thy Temple in the days of yore. How deep was their love of Thee…” In other words: our ancestors had the right emotional approach but their actions were cultic and dated. But this approach ignores the key role attention to detail plays in Judaism. The intricate preparation and ritual associated with the offerings required deep concentration and attentiveness of the officiating Cohanim. The predictability of the ritual allowed observers to become familiar with it through observation and provided a religious spectacle enhanced by an audience of thousands. The intricate symbolism of the ceremony reflected the Divine, while the concentration required to perform these repetitive tasks properly paralleled the human search for the Divine. G-d is in the details, if one pays enough attention. And this may be the reason Pesach arrives in the midst of Vayikra. As its name connotes, Pesach is about order, predictability, and concentration. Everyone knows the “script”: the haggada—which begins with a recitation of proper “seder”—order—in which we perform this entire ritual meal. Yet merely going through the haggada is insufficient. Our Sages commanded us to enlarge on the story, make it our own, add our own tunes and family tales to it. We must do everything required to bring personal attention and ownership to a tightly organized and highly predictable ritual meal. For the Intelligent Jew appearances are deceiving. At first glance both the offerings and the Seder seem almost too ritualistic and detailed to demand our attention, let alone our interest. Yet upon closer inspection we see their depth: each marshals the emotions that allow us to search for the Divine. Considering the state of the world today, we will need all the help we can get. |